Sunday, April 23, 2017

Sailing around the world in 74-109 days at 24 knots is possible on a flat earth


Flat earth map

In this figure you see the shortest path for sailing around the world on a flat plane:
A = 25E-45W, 60-22,5-50 South
B = 45W-75W, 50-70 South
C = 75W-150E, 70S-30N-60S
D = 150E-115E, 60S
E = 115E-25E, 60S-0S-60S

Average latitude

lat-av-A = (55+22.5)/2=38,75 = 128,75
lat-av-B = 60 = 150
lat-av-C = (155+60)/2 = 107,5
lat-av-D = 60 = 150
lat-av-E = (60+0)/2 = 30 = 120

Average radius (lat+90)

rad-av-A = 2*pi*6371*(128,75/360) = 14.316 km
rad-av-B,D = 2*pi*6371*(150/360) = 16.679 km
rad-av-C = 2*pi*6371*(107,5/360) = 11.953 km
rad-av-E = 2*pi*6371*(120/360) = 13.343 km

Approximate distance

dist-A = 2*pi*14.316*(25+45)/360 = 17.490 km
dist-B = 2*pi*16.679*(75-45)/360 = 8.733 km
dist-C = 2*pi*11.953*(180-150+75)/360 = 21.905 km
dist-D = 2*pi*16.679*(150-115)/360 = 10.188 km
dist-E =  2*pi*13.343*(115-25)/360 = 20.959 km

Total distance = 79.275 km = 42.805 seamiles

As they can sail around the world in 109-74 days they would sail at an average of 24 knots. This is very possible as for-instance the Groupama 3 has an average of 33 knots per hour. Or ABN AMRO TWO at 23 knots per hour.

Fore-going calculation is an approximation as we don't know what the real shape of the earth is and as we don't know what the correct map of the supposed flat earth looks like.

Source on speed: http://yachtpals.com/fastest-sailboats-2079
Original map source: http://www.hayatinanlaminedir.com/flatearth-grubundan-net-aciklama-dunya-yuvarlak-degil-duzdur/, https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/avr/avatar_1460116_1463417280.png

Friday, April 21, 2017

Light-source comes up within the clouds, suggesting nearby Sun


They tell us that the Sun is approximately 150 million km away and that from that distance it gives us daylight and warmth. The following photo is take from the site of The Australian Weathercam Network on 22 april 2017 at Wa Perth, Jandakot Airport (kijkend naar Noord-Oosten). http://www.weathercamnetwork.com.au The footage on the site is only kept for 7 days, as each new day replaces the old footage of 7 days ago.

Clouds and the position of the Sun

So why is this photo so very interesting. It all has to do with what side of the clouds is very bright and which side is dark. Normally when the Sun is far away and the clouds are relatively very close, only the back side of those clouds are bright. From our point of view the clouds should look dark. But that isn't what we observe. In this photo you see dark clouds and very bright clouds together, on a relative close proximity. The very bright clouds we see from our point of view are lightened from a light-source in front of those clouds and the dark clouds are lightened from behind. This means/ suggests that the light-source must be within the clouds itself.

Implications

It is impossible for the Sun at 150 million km to give this effect on the clouds, so the Sun or this light-source is much much closer. Earlier I did calculate that on a flat earth the Sun must be at a distance of approximately 6200 km. But the clouds that we see are most definitely not at that height, so the Sun would be even much closer to us. So if this is the case then the shape of the earth might not be flat also, but more-likely some kind of concave shape. Some time ago I tried to do some maths on this one, but have been unable to come up with a good mathematical solution. So for now for me the shape of things is still under discussion. And for now I cannot explain this photo, as it suggests that the light-source might be only a few km above the surface. If this is the case then one light-source hasn't the capability for giving light for almost halve the earth. Or they use several Sun simulators or we might live in some kind of projection (holographic or maybe projected in our minds). So the question remains, do we live on a flat earth or do we live in some kind of projection. Foregoing photo gives more questions then answers in this respect.

Monday, April 10, 2017

What is wrong with the stretched sun?



This photo is taken by a close friend of me and I personally find it very very interesting. Not of the long straight line at sea-level or the very flat horizon, but it is because of the sun. The sky is clear, you see an aircraft pass-by with a real void air-plain streak and not some chem-trails. So a real clear sky! But the most important thing you see is the sun. Normally when you see the sun, it should be round. But in this photo it doesn't has this shape. When you look at the water-level it shows us that it is no-time-laps-photo and the camera hasn't moved. What is causing this shape of the sun and what might be an explanation for this?

Explaining the stretched sun!

Very important thing you see in the sun, is that it looks stretched. From the left-under side to the upper right-side the distance is bigger, then from the left-above side to the lower right-side. This means there is some kind of distortion or there is some-kind of object interfering or simply entering here. There are two big bright bursts of sun-light at the top and the bottom of the sun, with a small degree in its axis.

Are there two suns?

At the sides you see some light exiting the sun. I like to point out the 1 left high and the 1 right low position. Next to that the 2 left low and the 2 right high position. In the last photo all lines cross at a centre-point. So or this sun is stretched or there might be 2 light-sources. As we have been taught that the sun is round than what we see can only be explained with 2 suns or an object entering our realm. If you connect the dots there seems to be an object in-front our sun which results in light distortion, or there is another sun coming into our system. You judge for yourself!

Additional proof Sky Cam Hong Kong

Skycam shows us what is going on in the sky and from time to time it looks very strange. For instance this video is taken from www.allskycam.com at Hong Kong of 19 april 2017. In the video it looks like the sun is flickering or moving around. If you put circles around the bright sun-area you can conclude that you cannot complete it with one circle. Two are needed, which means that there is something going on with the sun. It supports the fore-mentioned statement about the stretched sun. 

video









Additional proof Australia Jandakot Airport

Here is some additional proof of the Sun in Australia at Jandakot Airport looking to the North-East. In this case I have also inverted the colours, so in the black you can see clearly that the Sun has not a normal circular shape. This is of the date 24 april 2017.





Source photo: S. Zijlstra 9 april 2017, Akkrum, Netherlands.

More interesting information on the sun: what is the distance to the sun at the horizon?

Monday, April 3, 2017

Space-shuttle flight with entering outer-space lower then its highest point

Be my guest and analyse this video. It shows speed, altitude and range of the space-shuttle. Interestingly the most important fact of this video isn't that it reaches 356.704 ft aka 108,72 km (at 6:32 min) but that the signs of going into outer-space (yellow coloration (friction fire) (at 9:03)), signal disturbance  (at 8:28) to occur after this point at a lower altitude 337.582 ft aka 102,89 km . At 9:29 they tell us that we have gone into outer-space at 344.227 ft aka 104,92 km. So how come these signs don't appear earlier as the space-shuttle gets to a higher point.


No outer-space

Answer: they don't go into outer-space as there is a ceiling at around 73 miles height aka 117 km. They have to correct their height as they probably get to close to it, but the signs like a signal disturbance and the friction coloration's have not occurred yet. This 6 km difference in height doesn't make sense unless they cannot go into outer-space and so have to fake the whole thing. The signal disturbance is the point after which they edit what you see.


More reading: Fake moon CGI