Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Michelson-Morley experiment disprove rotating globe

On a rapidly revolving earth combined with the movement of the earth around the sun, we can understand that with a correctly executed experiment that it would have proven movement. We turn around the axis on the equator at a speed of 6371*2*pi/(24*60*60) = 463 m/s. Next to that we revolve around the Sun at a speed of 150.000.000*2*pi/(365*24*60*60) = 29,885 km/s. This would mean a total moment of 29,885+0,463 = 30,348 km/s. We all understand that it is a tremendous high speed, which actually should be noticeable or measurable. For this is the Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) thought of. How does this experiment work and did it actually fail?

Principle of Michelson-Morley experiment

It you shine a light or laser at a mirror splitting the light, so that one beam goes with the movement of the earth and one beam on a ninety degree angle to the north, then due to the movement of the earth the first beam will be slowed down. When mirrored back the first beam will reach the detector before the second beam. The result can then be translated into a speed difference of roughly 30 km/s.

Photo: V.V.Demjanow 2010 (3)

Some calculations

For instance if the mirrors are 100 km north and east of the detector/ laser, then to the north the beam travels 2*100 km / 300.000 km/s = 6,6666667*10^-4 seconds. But if the beam goes east, then it will be slowed down by the movement. So as it travels to the mirror it is slowed down by the mirror so that 100 km / (300.000-30.000) km/s = 3,703703704*10^-4 seconds. But after it is mirrored the movement is in favour of the beam so that 100 km / (300.000+30.000) km/s = 3,03030303*10^-4 seconds. Difference would be 3,703703704+3,03030303-6,6666667 = 0,067340064*10^-4 seconds. But in the mean time the earth has moved also, so we need to iterate, which I will do here only once as an example. In 3,703703704*10^-4 s the earth moves (times 30,348 km) 0,01124 km, so that 100,01124 /  (300.000-30.000) km/s = 3,70412*10^-4 seconds. But The detector will have moved also so 3,70412+3,030303 = 6,7344*10^-4 seconds * 30,348 = 0,020437626 km. This results in 99,9795 km / (300.000+30.000) = 3,029683708*10^-4 seconds and results in a total time of 6,7338037*10^-4 seconds. This results in a difference of 0,06713700828*10^-4 seconds. If this would be measured then it would suggest earth movement.

Failed experiment or not?

The Michelson-Morley experiment showed that the earth would have a movement of around 4-8 km/s. This was 40 times less then expected on a moving earth, resulting in a null-test. This means that the assumed movement was not there, or was much less. This experiment is called by the established scientific community a big failed experiment. None the less, after this experiment similar experiments have been done also resulting in a null-test. Joos (1930) resulted in 1,5 km/s (375) times less then what expected) and Trimmer et.al. 2,5-3,8 cm/s (1973). So the question here for sure is, have all these experiments failed or can the null-result simply be explained due to a flat earth or motionless plane. I would suggest that all these null-test experiments like Michelson-Morley (1887) actually disprove a rapidly revolving globe earth.

(1) http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment#Subsequent_experiments
(3) Why Trimmer et al. "Did not detect" Aether Wind in 1973 http://vixra.org/abs/1008.0075

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Explanation on big chuncks of ice falling from the sky

From time to time you see unusual news like chuncks ice fall from the sky. The sky is clear but from out of nothing a big chunck of ice falls down. In many cases they will explain this phenomenon due to ice-buildup on the wings of plains. But in many cases the chuncks are enormous and might be the cause of crater-holes, and therefore are not caused by plains. Think about a strange phenomenon like gigantic blue-like icebergs made of 100% pure clean frozen water. So where does that come from. These most-likely also fall from the sky.

Firmament and ice-buildup

On a flat earth as described in the bible there is a firmament over the motionless plane. This glass like bowl is considered to be at a 100 km height above the earth. At that altitude it can get extremely cold and so moist and maybe condensation would freeze instantly as it would come into contact with the extreme cold glass-layer. This ice would then steadily grow in size up to the point it lets go. Small rock-sized chunks fall all over the world, but from time to time these can be much bigger.

Round craters

As the firmament is at 100 km height, the speed that the ice-chuncks would have, would be very great. Lets say about 200-300 km/hour. If a huge chunck would come down at great speed, it has an immense power. It might result in craters of several hundreds of meters in diameter. From the moment the ice lets loose the chunck falls in a straight line down (as the flat earth isn't rotating). This would mean that the chunck would crash into the earth at 90 degree angle, always resulting in an almost round crater. This is why craters all over the world seem to be round, and cannot be explained by meteors crashing down, at all kinds of angles on a rapidly rotating earth.